Skip to main content
Banner [Small]

Test out our new Bento Search

test area
x
# results
shortcut
Sections
HTML elements
Section Tiles
expand
Tile Cover
Mouse
Math Lab
Space
Tile Short Summary
Math Lab Rooms located in the Main Library in rooms 300X and 300Y
expand
Tile Cover
coffee
CC's Coffee House
Space
Tile Short Summary
Located at the first floor of the LSU Main Library.
expand
Tile Cover
People troubleshooting on a computer
Ask Us
Service
Tile Short Summary
Check our FAQs, submit a question using our form, or launch the chat widget to find help.

Gear

44

FAQ

169
Does the library offer a book delivery service?
Yes, LSU Library offers book deliveries to faculty and staff only . We will deliver LSU Library books and interlibrary loan books to your departmental mailbox. Reserve and Government Document materials will not be included. To use the service, request the item through your interlibrary loan account. On the request form under "Delivery Options" select "Deliver to Departmental Mailbox." The request will arrive 1-2 business days from the date we receive the item. Heres how to get your materials delivered:
- You will need an ILLiad account to make the request.
- Once logged in, you will need to select "Deliver to Departmental Mailbox" for your Delivery Method. Books will be delivered to the departmental mailbox of the requestors within 1-2 business days. A second attempt will be made if the delivery is not successful the first time, but if the department office is inaccessible again, patrons will receive an e-mail stating the problem and asking them to come pick up their materials.
- The materials will be placed on hold and kept at the checkout desk for 7 days. If they are not picked up in this time frame, they will be returned to the collection. Be aware of the following:
- Users are responsible for returning materials back to the library.
- Materials will be checked out to the patrons library account prior to being delivered.
- The user is responsible for the items requested through this service.
- Any LSU Library books not returned or renewed within 40 days of the due date will be considered lost and the usual penalties will apply.
- A limit of eight physical material format items can be requested per day. LSU Libraries | Book Delivery Answered by: Access Services Staff

Database Listing

375

Staff

101

Discovery

2062258
Standard Specification for Dry-Cast Concrete Masonry Units for Construction of Catch Basins and Manholes
This specification covers solid precast segmental concrete masonry units made from hydraulic cement, water, and suitable mineral aggregates, with or without the inclusion of other materials. The units are intended for use in the construction of catch basins and manholes. All units shall be sound and free of cracks or other defects that interfere with the proper placing of the unit.1.1 This specification covers dry-cast solid precast segmental concrete masonry units machine-made from hydraulic cement, water, and suitable mineral aggregates, with or without the inclusion of other materials. The units are intended for use in the construction of catch basins and manholes. 1.2 The text of this standard referenced notes and footnotes that provide explanatory material. These notes and footnotes (excluding those in tables and figures) shall not be considered as requirements of the standard. 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Diagnostic test accuracy of dipstick urinalysis in clean catch urine for urinary tract infection in febrile infants presenting to emergency departments: a post-hoc analysis of the FIDO study
Summary Background Studies where urine is typically obtained via invasive methods, show dipstick urinalysis can accurately screen for urinary tract infection (UTI) in febrile infants under 90 days old. However, evidence is limited in settings where clean catch urine collection is standard practice. This study assessed the accuracy of dipstick for UTI in a prospective cohort of febrile infants presenting to UK and Ireland emergency departments, where clean catch is the predominant urine collection method.Methods Post-hoc analysis of the Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcome study, a prospective multicentre observational cohort study. Febrile infants ≤90 days old were recruited from 35 Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI) sites (NCT05259683) between 6th July 2022 and the 31st August 2023. Accuracy of dipstick urinalysis testing for detecting UTI was reported with sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.Findings In this multicentre prospective study of 1821 febrile infants ≤90 days, point-of-care dipstick urinalysis was performed in 57.1% of cases. Diagnostic accuracy varied significantly by age, sex, and method of dipstick assessment. Sensitivity was lowest in neonates (≤28 days; 53.3%) and if dipsticks were user-inspected (57.1%), highlighting limitations in these subgroups. In contrast, automated dipstick testing in infants >28 days achieved high sensitivity (87.5%) and moderate specificity (73.4%) at a cut-off of ≥trace leukocytes and/or ≥trace nitrites. Specificity was notably lower in female infants (60.3%) than males (85.0%), likely due to higher contamination rates in clean catch samples.Interpretation Automated dipstick urinalysis offers a reliable method for excluding UTI in infants >28 days and can guide selective urine culture use when clean catch urine sampling is used. However, dipstick testing of samples obtained by clean catch should not be used to rule out UTI in neonates or when relying on manual interpretation due to poor sensitivity.Funding Royal College of Emergency Medicine Doctoral Fellowship (RCEM 02/03/2021), the funders played no part in study conception or design.
Using acoustic telemetry to inform standardisation of catch rates from passive fishing gear: A case study using dusky flathead (Platycephalus fuscus)
Estuaries are dynamic ecosystems and the species which inhabit them often support important commercial, recreational and indigenous fisheries. Catch rate standardisations are an essential component of many contemporary stock assessments, yet these standardisation processes often do not incorporate environmental variability and its influence on catchability. Here, we use acoustic tagging to quantify the relationship between environmental variation and small-scale, within-estuary, movement rates of dusky flathead (Platycephalus fuscus), a key fishery species in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. These relationships were then included as environmentally-mediated proxies for catchability in the standardisation of commercial mesh (gill) net catch rates. The case study showed that the probability of movement increased with freshwater inflow and varied across the lunar cycle. The effect of freshwater inflow was reflected in the commercial catch data of five estuaries, with greater catches of dusky flathead correlated with higher freshwater inflow, including one of the estuaries in which fish were acoustically tagged. Incorporating environmental effects (such as freshwater inflow) into catch standardisations of the five estuaries did not alter the overall trajectory of the time series but there were differences of up to 50.9 % (mean 12.3 %, SD 10.2 %) in the standardised index values in some years. Additionally, the study also found that large-scale weather drivers correlate with small biases in abundance indices when environmental conditions were excluded from standardisation processes. These results highlight the value of biological information and ecological experiments (including acoustic tracking studies) for validating assumptions in the broader stock assessment process such as how environmental variables may be influencing catchability or availability/density.
Ghost fishing catch estimates based on annual retrieval operations in Norwegian waters
Ghost fishing, the incidental capture of marine organisms by abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear (ALDFG), poses a significant threat to marine ecosystems and biodiversity. Yet, comprehensive data on the ghost fishing catch in Norwegian waters, remains largely unavailable. To contribute to filling this data gap, we analyzed data from seven years (2018–2024) of retrieval operations targeting commercial derelict fishing gear. The ghost fishing catch consisted predominantly of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides), Northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua), edible crab (Cancer pagurus), red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), and snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio). Additionally, cetaceans, elasmobranchs, and a pinniped were caught. In Norwegian waters, reported gillnet losses result in yearly ghost fishing catches of 566 tons under the best-case scenario, 990 tons under the intermediate scenario, and 3723 tons under the worst-case scenario. Generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMMs) indicated a significant reduction in ghost fishing catch at retrieval in derelict king crab pots following the introduction of escape mechanisms. This study highlights the substantial biomass and biodiversity loss in the Norwegian marine environment caused by ALDFG, impacting both commercially valuable and endangered species. It also documents the effectiveness of escape mechanisms in reducing ghost fishing catch in derelict pots.
Throw and Catch: Analyzing the Synchronized Movements of Eyes and Joints in Children
Throw and catch are fundamental motor skills that are closely related to eye-hand coordination, reaction speed, and spatial awareness in children. Current research on throw and catch mainly focuses on the impact of attentional focus, anticipatory knowledge, and training on visuomotor control. Little work has been done on the synchronized movements of eyes and joints during the throw and catch. To understand how these synchronized movements contribute to the success rate of throwing and catching, we proposed a video-based framework named Synchronized Eye and Joint Analysis (SEJA). This framework locates, extracts, and analyzes the essential eye and joint movements from untrimmed first-person and third-person view videos. Using the proposed framework, throw and catch events in long untrimmed videos were successfully identified, and whether each catch was successful was accurately assessed. Additionally, detailed metrics related to predictive gaze behaviors and predictive hand movements for each catch event were obtained. On a dataset consisting of videos from 56 children aged 7 to 10, the proposed framework delivered an average precision (AP) ranging from 0.5 to 0.95 at 0.881 for task localization and achieved an accuracy of 0.985 in predicting whether a catch was successful. Our research indicated that children with higher catch success rates showed shorter delays in predicting the ball’s trajectory, smaller amplitudes of body movement, and more pronounced predictive saccades (rapid eye movements to anticipate the ball’s position). These findings are crucial for comprehending and improving the development of motor skills in children.