Skip to main content
Banner [Small]

Test out our new Bento Search

test area
x
# results
shortcut
Sections
HTML elements
Section Tiles
expand
Tile Cover
Mouse
Math Lab
Space
Tile Short Summary
Math Lab Rooms located in the Main Library in rooms 300X and 300Y
expand
Tile Cover
coffee
CC's Coffee House
Space
Tile Short Summary
Located at the first floor of the LSU Main Library.
expand
Tile Cover
People troubleshooting on a computer
Ask Us
Service
Tile Short Summary
Check our FAQs, submit a question using our form, or launch the chat widget to find help.

Website

207

Gear

44

FAQ

169

Database Listing

376

Staff

101

Discovery

2063803
Effects on catches of green and blue light emitting diodes at the frame lines of diurnally deployed estuarine penaeid trawls
Penaeid trawls are among the world’s least selective fishing gears. This characteristic has justified decadal attempts at resolution and most commonly via retroactively fitted ‘bycatch reduction devices’ in the posterior sections to promote fish escape. However, ideally unwanted species would never enter a trawl. This study sought to investigate if fish could be avoided in diurnally deployed estuarine penaeid trawls via light emitting diodes (LEDs) located at the frame lines (headline and footrope). The assumption of few confounding effects of attaching six inactive LEDs (i.e. structures) to the frame lines was validated (experiment 1) before separate experiments were done to assess the effects on catches due to six active blue or green LEDs on the footrope (experiment 2) and then on the headline (experiment 3). Catches of the targeted school prawns, Metapenaeus macleayi and some fish (across all sizes; 4–20 cm total lengths), including mulloway, Argyrosomus japonicus, southern herring, Herklotsichthys castelnaui, and painted stinkfish, Eocallionymus papilio were similarly and significantly lower in trawls with at least one active LED treatment, and with greater consistency when these were on the headline. Some loss of target catches would preclude the commercial use of LEDs on the frame lines of the tested trawls. However, evidence of strong responses among some fish and their known behavioural and swimming differences to penaeids might support testing LEDs at other locations, including inside trawls, to reduce bycatches while maintaining target catches.
The environmental trade-off of fertiliser, residue and catch crop management in Danish cropping systems
Context Nitrogen is an essential macronutrient in agriculture, affecting both crop yields and soil health. In Denmark, one of the most densely farmed regions in the world, excess reactive nitrogen (Nr) compounds are lost to the environment along gaseous and hydrological pathways in forms such as nitrate, ammonia, nitrogen oxides and dinitrogen.Objectives Here, we aim to assess the effect of different field management practices (fertilisation, crop residue management or cultivation of catch crops) on environmental Nr losses and the field scale soil net GHG balance (i.e., sum of soil C stock changes and direct and indirect N2O emissions).Methods For this purpose, highly detailed data from the Danish Agricultural Watershed Monitoring Program (LOOP-program; 2013–2019) were used in combination with the process-based model LandscapeDNDC.Results and conclusions The results indicate that a mixture of organic and synthetic fertilisers turns soils to a stronger net sink of GHGs (∼70 – ∼514 kgCO2−eq ha−1 yr−1) compared to exclusive use of only one type of fertiliser. In addition, incorporating crop residue and cultivation of catch crops increases the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by 3–11 % on average and decreases environmental Nr losses.Significance These findings emphasize the potential of targeted fertiliser, residue and catch crop management to increase the sustainability of crop production systems in Denmark.