Skip to main content
Banner [Small]

Test out our new Bento Search

test area
x
# results
shortcut
Sections
HTML elements
Section Tiles
expand
Tile Cover
Mouse
Math Lab
Space
Tile Short Summary
Math Lab Rooms located in the Main Library in rooms 300X and 300Y
expand
Tile Cover
coffee
CC's Coffee House
Space
Tile Short Summary
Located at the first floor of the LSU Main Library.
expand
Tile Cover
People troubleshooting on a computer
Ask Us
Service
Tile Short Summary
Check our FAQs, submit a question using our form, or launch the chat widget to find help.

Website

207

Gear

44

FAQ

169
Does the library offer a book delivery service?
Yes, LSU Library offers book deliveries to faculty and staff only . We will deliver LSU Library books and interlibrary loan books to your departmental mailbox. Reserve and Government Document materials will not be included. To use the service, request the item through your interlibrary loan account. On the request form under "Delivery Options" select "Deliver to Departmental Mailbox." The request will arrive 1-2 business days from the date we receive the item. Heres how to get your materials delivered:
- You will need an ILLiad account to make the request.
- Once logged in, you will need to select "Deliver to Departmental Mailbox" for your Delivery Method. Books will be delivered to the departmental mailbox of the requestors within 1-2 business days. A second attempt will be made if the delivery is not successful the first time, but if the department office is inaccessible again, patrons will receive an e-mail stating the problem and asking them to come pick up their materials.
- The materials will be placed on hold and kept at the checkout desk for 7 days. If they are not picked up in this time frame, they will be returned to the collection. Be aware of the following:
- Users are responsible for returning materials back to the library.
- Materials will be checked out to the patrons library account prior to being delivered.
- The user is responsible for the items requested through this service.
- Any LSU Library books not returned or renewed within 40 days of the due date will be considered lost and the usual penalties will apply.
- A limit of eight physical material format items can be requested per day. LSU Libraries | Book Delivery Answered by: Access Services Staff

Database Listing

375

Archive Records

41199

Staff

101

Discovery

2065107
Catch crops promote soil physical recovery after forage crop grazing
Soil compaction-induced physical degradation is a threat to sustainable crop production and environmental performance. While measures have been evaluated to alleviate compaction, the impact of catch crops establishment on soil physical recovery following winter grazing remains underexplored. Six New Zealand trials over different years investigated: (1) the effects of soil compaction induced by winter forage crop grazing on soil health, and (2) the effectiveness of catch crops establishment in facilitating soil recovery. Our findings revealed that winter grazing resulted in significant soil physical degradation in the top 10 cm, evidenced by significant reduction in total porosity, macroporosity, available water content, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), and soil quality S index. The degree of soil degradation was higher under increased grazing intensity (fodder beet grazing compared with kale grazing) and wetter conditions. For example, in Te Pirita-2019 with kale, changes in Ks were not significant. However, in Te Pirita-2019 with fodder beet, Ks decreased significantly from 1548 mm day-¹ to 88 mm day-¹, representing a 94.3 % reduction. Compared with fallow after grazing, growing catch crops promoted soil restoration. Conventional moldboard ploughing and the recently introduced single-pass ‘spader-drill’ outperformed direct drill for soil recovery. This study highlighted the importance of catch crop establishment using conventional tillage and spade drill to mitigate soil degradation resulting from winter forage crop grazing. The spader-drill, where soil conditions allow, is preferred because it allows earlier sowing of catch crops, leading to broader benefits such as increased crop biomass and reduced nitrogen leaching.
Pass the batten! Alternative pot design increases catch efficiency in a Southern Rock Lobster fishery
The South Australian Rock Lobster Fishery uses baited pots, traditionally ‘beehive’ in shape, to capture Southern Rock Lobster (Jasus edwardsii). Fishery harvest is controlled through annual quota that is set relative to performance indicators of relative abundance (Catch Per Unit Effort) for legal-size and pre-recruit lobsters. Under quota-based controls, improvements in catch efficiency through alternative pot designs offer an opportunity to reduce input costs and improve net economic return with low risk to stock sustainability. However, for performance indicators such as CPUE to remain robust, any changes in fishing efficiency must be accounted for in stock assessment. This study collected data from 13 fishers over 768 sampling days resulting in five treatments and 14,006 individual potlifts from the South Australian Northern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery. Geo-statistical methods, developed to control for temporal and spatial covariates, and variable lobster abundance, indicated higher catch efficiency of legal-size and undersize lobsters in ‘batten’ pots compared to ‘beehive’ pots. Ratios of mean legal-size catch weight ρˆCWPUEand undersize lobster (number) (ρˆPRI)from beehive pots to batten pots were estimated to be 0.62 and 0.68, respectively. Applying the ratio ρˆCWPUEwith respect to effort, fishers adopting batten pot designs may reduce future effort (potlifts) to take quota by up to 38 %. Potential increases in undersize catches of up to 32 % for fishers using batten pot designs would be offset by an overall reduction in effort. The taxonomic composition of bycatch was similar in batten pots and beehive pots. Generally lower catches of all bycatch were observed from batten pots and further reductions in bycatch discard rates would be likely where effort is reduced via their use to take quota. The number of depredated lobsters recorded during testing was similar between batten pots and beehive pots also indicating that reduced effort to attain quota with batten pots could lower the absolute number of dead lobsters landed each season. Methods to account for differences in pot-specific catch efficiency in future harvest strategy decision rules are discussed.
Evaluating drivers and predictability of catch composition in a highly mixed trawl fishery using stacked and joint species distribution models
Evaluating drivers and the predictability of catch is valuable for the management of mixed fisheries. Drivers can represent or help to identify levers for management and predictable catch compositions are a key component of simulation tools and dynamic management strategies. But modelling mixed fisheries can be challenging due to the large number of taxa, and analysis typically focuses on a few key species or highly aggregated taxa. Here we employ seven types of stacked and joint species distribution models to explore the drivers and predictability of trawl-level catches in an ocean prawn trawl fishery, in New South Wales, Australia. Catch data was sourced from an observer program, with 130 taxa able to be modelled. The main drivers of catch composition were latitude, depth, and seasonality represented here by water temperature. Water column mixing, lunar illumination, and fishing effort were also important for some taxa. Up to 60–80 taxa were predicted with good predictive skill (AUC>0.8, >35 % decline in mean absolute error relative to an intercept-only model), and an additional 40–60 taxa were predicted with lower but still useful predictive skill (AUC>0.7, 25–35 % decline in error). However, the level of predictive skill varied considerably among model type. The best framework for prediction was stacked random forests using a hurdle modelling approach, followed by a spatial joint species distribution model. Our results show that predictive models at a fine spatial-temporal and taxonomic resolutions can be a viable information tool for highly mixed fisheries, but these tools ultimately need to be tested against specific management objectives and performance metrics, such as spatial closures and bycatch:target catch ratios.